Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Regulatory Approaches for Artificial Intelligence Systems

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) as a global technological phenomenon presents unique regulatory challenges that intersect with cultural, ethical, and societal norms. This research discusses cultural perspectives that inform the regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence systems across diverse geopolitical regions. In Western domains, such as the European Union and the United States, there is a pronounced emphasis on protecting individual rights and privacy. The EU's GDPR and the Artificial Intelligence Act epitomize this stance, underscoring the need for transparency and accountability in AI systems. The U.S. follows suit with similar priorities, though with its specific regulatory approaches. Contrastingly, Eastern perspectives, particularly in China, prioritize state sovereignty and social order over individual privacy concerns. AI regulation is typified by state-centric governance, with AI as a tool for societal management and economic advancement. The Global South, including regions like Africa, Latin America, and parts of Asia, offers a different paradigm that gravitates towards economic growth and leveraging AI for societal advancement, while being mindful of avoiding new forms of colonialism in AI development and application. International organizations such as the United Nations and the OECD are endeavoring to establish universal standards that respect a mosaic of values, advocating for principles like inclusivity, sustainability, and transparency that are adaptable to various cultural contexts. Furthermore, indigenous perspectives are gaining recognition, advocating for collective rights, the protection of ancestral knowledge, and consideration of the long-term societal impacts of AI. This exploration highlights the complexity faced by global policymakers in formulating AI regulations that are both effective and culturally considerate. It contributes to the wider discourse on AI governance, underscoring the importance of integrating a spectrum of cultural values and priorities.